The Catalan Center of Luxembourg is pleased to invite you to the round table analyzing the electoral results of the 25 of November 2012 in the Parliament of Catalonia. The talk will take place on Saturday 8 December 2012 at 17.00 Center hours local Catalan Luxembourg (88, Rue de la Semois, Luxembourg Ville).
At the round table, will be analyzed and debated among all the attendees, while drinking coffee, the results of these elections which were unexpected and surprised everyone. To avoid the monopolization of time by one or several participants, there will be a moderator who will limit interventions based on the number of participants.
Prepare your interventions.
Incongruity, cap
You have many names, the incongruity. As many names as you want to search or find. The names are the least, names are like excuses, that there are not so many cases to excuse. Incongruity inhabits us. It must be like the devil that, through and like language, based on twists and turns, it takes over all of us. Maybe that's why the devil also has so many names.
The congruent, the follower of congruisme, he who seeks the virtue of congruous grace, the simple man is, paradoxically, what best suits the circumstances or the requirements of each case.
Let's take the case of independence, which is the opposite of dependency, which is the non-dependent, that which enjoys freedom. Those who want independence are those who understand that we are dependent, that we have no freedom. So far no problem, everyone can agree. Ah, but not everyone agrees on wanting independence. Maybe those who don't agree want to be dependent? No, they will answer. They will say that they already agree that sovereignty rests with the Spanish State or Kingdom of Spain. Which is not appropriate, that we are already fine like this, that he doesn't touch now or that he will never touch. Little, as many positions as the aggregate results of each and every one of the formations that have had electoral support. The people have spoken. The people have said what they think and the result is what we have now.
On the one hand, we have those who have taken the bulk of the opinion of the general public. They say that independence could be a good thing and that they have decided to ask the people about it. again? And because they didn't ask now, set to do? He says no, that they don't let them ask the question. I what, anyway, they will ask. They will ask in a referendum that is already known, they say, which cannot be done, or in a query for which it is not known what the question will be or whether it will be valid regardless of the answer that is given, separate interpretations.
Of congruism, to seek the congruent virtue, little or cap. We will have to adapt to the circumstances or the requirements of the case that is presented when it is presented, that it seems that the only thing that has become clear is that the matter must be presented. Sooner or later, that this is the only motive that moves those who now have the ability to form a government, what are they, as already seems clear, those on the side of those who have taken the big part and those who, on the other hand, there are seconds left, far from the first, and that they are in a peloton with two other groups, which present discourses quite different from their own. these, the seconds, they don't say that independence could be a good thing, they claim that independence would surely be a good thing. That if it were for them we should already be and that since they don't want to anger the rest of the citizens, that it seems they are not so clear, they would also be and agree to ask the town. again? And because they didn't ask now? He says no, that this question did not touch now and that whoever has to answer this question that has not yet been proposed must do so, for fi, in a consultation or referendum held for the purpose.
The third and the fourth, who are the second and third in the peloton, they say very different things to each other at the same time that they agree with each other that whether it is a consultation or a referendum, ells, each other, they would ask for a negative vote. That vote that presumes that the way we are, we are already fine; and that they already agree, they say as much as each other, in which sovereignty rests with the Spanish State or Kingdom of Spain, except for the third party's disagreement with the fourth party's in that the sovereignty to formulate the question should belong to both the Catalan people and the Spanish people. I what, anyway, We buy, independence is not suitable, or that it doesn't play now, some say, or that it will never play, the others. The second of the peloton and third of the general, undoubtedly weakened by a pajara, they would be for consultation later, because who should answer this question, they say, it should do so in a purposefully considered and well-proposed consultation, thinking no doubt that before making an escape and trying to catch those who escaped they must wait for a better opportunity. While the third in the peloton and fourth in the general classification, who do not aspire to win the stage or the lap, but rather they are reserved for La Vuelta, they would not refuse a referendum held among all the citizens of the Spanish State or Kingdom of Spain to whom it belongs, they say, yet, the sovereignty to do so.
further back, the fifth, they say or have said that they would be in favor of a referendum or consultation in which they would ask the people of the town to vote for what they want to vote for. That want independence, they want her, but that they don't break their heads too much thinking about it every night, although they do not want to be dependent. And what will they answer?, as they have always done, It doesn't matter what they say; and that they already agree that sovereignty rests with the people, whether this people is the Spanish people or the Catalan people federated or not with the Spanish people. That the independence to agree, suits, and that as we are we are not good because if it doesn't change we could be there too; and what to touch, toca, always rings, because otherwise it will never play and it is time for it to play.
The sixth, those who have expressed the greatest joy upon learning the election results, being happy to remain the sixth and not the last. That's why they're the last, ells, they already went through it and now it's up to others who, by the way, they are even happier than they are. Even happier than when those who have now expressed the greatest joy were. These sixth graders make it clear that joy cannot be given if it is not given to everyone, so they do not agree on wanting independence. Maybe they want to be dependent? No, they answer. They say that they already agree that sovereignty rests with the people, State or Kingdom of Spain. Which is not appropriate, that we are already fine like this, that it does not touch now and that it will never touch. Little, than, as well as those behind them and in the queue - in position rather than in contentment and joy- they do not agree on any of the other formations that have had electoral support. And that the people must speak and be free, We buy, nothing to make the people speak in consultations or referendums. And even less in the Catalan people. If it was about the Spanish people still, who is the only one who has the power to exercise sovereignty in this, in others and in all the questions that are raised or come to be raised. In this they differ deeply from their colleagues in the queue who do not follow them and who say - and do not swear because they say they do not know what it means to swear- that what they would like is easy to understand: Even now!
————————————————–
Anton